Seven Years Later.. What are you prepared to burn?

By Julie Githiri

After the quiet realisation that COVID 19 was not three years ago but nearly seven, have you paused to ask yourself what you have actually built, shifted, or become since then?

Seven years.

It feels both like yesterday and another lifetime.

That period forced us into something few of us were prepared for: collective upheaval. Loss sat at our tables. Fear became a daily companion. The illusion of control dissolved almost overnight.

It was all on the menu.

Our mental health absorbed the impact. Anxiety normalised itself. Depression disguised itself as fatigue. Relationships, romantic, familial, even friendships were placed under a magnifying glass. Some cracked under pressure during lockdown. Others survived, only to quietly unravel later. Proximity does not always equal intimacy. And survival does not always mean growth.

Seven years is often culturally referenced as the “itch” period. The point at which comfort turns to restlessness. Where familiarity begins to feel restrictive. Where the question forms, is this it?

So, what is your itch this year?

Is it your career? The role that once felt prestigious but now feels performative?
Is it your body neglected, overworked, uncelebrated?
Is it the relationship you are maintaining out of loyalty rather than vitality?
Is it the version of yourself you’ve outgrown?

Everything feels up for evaluation.

In many African and diasporic cultures, endurance is praised. Stability is admired. Respectability is currency. We are taught to maintain marriages, reputations, roles even when something inside us quietly withers.

But what if maintenance is not the same as alignment?

What if this season is asking you not to preserve but to reassess?

There is a provocative line from the film Outlast: “Let it burn. Burn the whole thing down.”

It sounds reckless. Dramatic. Dangerous.

But sometimes burning is not destruction… it is transformation.

Forest fires, while devastating, create fertile ground for regeneration. Old growth makes space for new life. What if some parts of your life are not meant to be sustained, but surrendered?

What do you have to lose?

That question is confronting. Because often what we have to lose is not the relationship, the job, or the status, it is identity.

Maybe the real discomfort of the last seven years is not what happened externally, but what surfaced internally.

Maybe you discovered that you no longer like the version of yourself you became in order to cope.

Or perhaps more painfully, you realised who you never allowed yourself to become at all.

That realisation can sting, like a mwiko (wooden spoon) striking across wet legs. Sharp. Immediate. Unavoidable. It jolts you awake.

But jolts are not punishments. They are invitations.

Starting again, however, is terrifying.

Especially if you are someone who prides yourself on being composed. In control. Strategic. The dependable one.

Let’s talk about control.

For many high-functioning adults particularly those raised in environments where uncertainty was unsafe, control feels like protection. If you decide how, when, and where something unfolds, you reduce risk. You minimise chaos.

Right?

Actually …not quite.

Control can also be a sophisticated form of fear.

Fear of vulnerability.
Fear of failure.
Fear of visibility.
Fear of needing something that may not be reciprocated.

The pandemic taught us something uncomfortable: control is often an illusion.

We could not control infection rates. We could not control economic shifts. We could not control how others responded to stress. What we could control sometimes barely, was our own response.

And even that felt fragile.

So perhaps the real growth of the last seven years is not about what you achieved promotions, partnerships, property, but about how you adapted.

Did you harden?
Did you soften?
Did you numb?
Did you awaken?

For some of you reading this, the idea of “burning it down” feels liberating. For others, it feels irresponsible. Especially within cultural frameworks where family expectations, communal identity, and generational sacrifice are deeply woven into decision-making.

The tension between personal freedom and collective responsibility is real.

But growth does not always require demolition.

Sometimes it requires truth.

Truth about what no longer fits.
Truth about what you desire.
Truth about the ways you have abandoned yourself in order to belong.

The seven-year itch is not always about leaving. It is about examining.

Maybe your itch is not your partner but your unexpressed needs.
Maybe it is not your job but your underused talent.
Maybe it is not your body but your relationship to it.

Maybe the thing that needs to “burn” is not your life, but the narrative you have been living inside.

Letting go of control does not mean recklessness. It means recalibration.

It means trusting that uncertainty is not inherently dangerous.

It means allowing yourself to become someone slightly unfamiliar.

And yes that can feel destabilising.

But it can also feel alive.

Seven years ago, the world shifted without asking our permission.

This time, perhaps, you get to choose the shift.

So as you stand in this post-pandemic landscape, ask yourself not just what you have achieved but who you have become.

And more importantly who you are ready to be.

Because sometimes things do need to burn.

Not to destroy you.

But to reveal you.

Warmly 

Jules

Oscillation: When Love Doesn’t Land

By Julie Githiri

Can it be as simple as incompatibility?

Attraction might be there.
Sexual chemistry might hum beneath the surface.
The body responds. The eyes linger. The conversation flows.

And yet there is something.

Something unnamed.
Something that does not fully settle in the nervous system.
A quiet internal knowing: this isn’t it.

They are not the person you instinctively want to be fully vulnerable with. Not the one you feel safe unravelling beside. Not the one you trust with your softer edges sexually or emotionally.

In many cultures particularly within African and diasporic communities’ compatibility is often measured through visible markers: family background, faith, education, reputation, culture, profession. Attraction may be secondary. Stability is prioritised. Endurance is admired.

But the body has its own criteria.

As a Psychosexual therapist, I often see the gap between external compatibility and internal safety. Two people may look perfect on paper. They may even perform intimacy well sexually fluent, attentive, responsive.

But sex without emotional safety eventually exposes the fracture.

Because sexual intimacy is not just a physical act. It is psychological exposure.

When you are sexually naked, you are not only offering your body. You are offering history. You are offering attachment style. You are offering the blueprint of how you learned to give and receive love.

And sometimes, even when desire is present, the deeper nervous system does not feel safe enough to attach.

We mistake arousal for alignment.

But arousal is chemistry.
Attachment is regulation.

One can exist without the other.

In clinical work, I see how early exposure shapes adult choice. If love in childhood was inconsistent, intrusive, emotionally unavailable, or overly conditional, the adult self may equate intensity with intimacy.

So, what feels like “chemistry” may actually be familiarity.

The nervous system says, I know this pattern.
Not, I am safe here.

And so, we enter connections that feel magnetic but destabilising. The sex may be passionate. The longing intense. But underneath, there is a subtle contraction a reluctance to fully rest.

That contraction matters.

Especially when the heart is ready. When you genuinely desire a relationship rooted in trust, respect, and integrity. When you are not seeking drama, but depth.

In that season, the body becomes more discerning.

You begin to notice:

Do I feel calm after intimacy or anxious?
Do I feel expanded or slightly diminished?
Do I feel chosen or tolerated?
Do I feel met or managed?

In many African family systems, vulnerability is not always modelled openly. Emotional literacy may be limited. Children learn resilience, responsibility, strength but not always attunement. Not always repair. Not always emotional transparency.

So as adults, we may know how to commit.
We may know how to endure.
But do we know how to feel safe being fully seen?

Sometimes what doesn’t land is not a failure of compatibility it is a misalignment of emotional capacity.

One person may be ready to build securely. The other may still be negotiating their relationship with vulnerability. One may want exclusivity; the other may want admiration. One may be sexually open; the other emotionally guarded.

And the body knows.

It knows when touch feels connecting versus consuming.
It knows when desire feels mutual versus performative.
It knows when you are slowly abandoning yourself in order to maintain the connection.

Not every attraction deserves access to your body.
Not every chemistry deserves attachment.

And not every relationship that ends was a mistake.

Some were lessons in discernment.

The deeper question becomes:

What was I exposed to that now guides my decision to let love land?

Was affection freely given or earned?
Was conflict safe or explosive?
Was closeness nurturing or overwhelming?

Because your adult sexuality is not separate from your childhood attachment. They are intricately linked.

The partners you feel drawn to.
The ones you hesitate with.
The ones you desire but do not trust.

These patterns are rarely random.

Incompatibility is real. Timing is real. Emotional readiness is real.

But so is self-awareness.

When love truly lands, it does not require you to override your intuition. It does not demand you shrink, perform, or prove.

It feels steady.
Grounded.
Unforced.

Not perfect but emotionally coherent.

And perhaps that is the quiet distinction between a love that excites… and a love that endures.

With warmth

Jules